Standing up for genomics in the media? Updated with Part 2

Last week I attended a terrific workshop. It was a media awareness session designed to help young scientists understand the media and possible interactions they may have with the media over the course of their careers. I’m going to do a couple of long posts on our Personal Genomics blog (because they are less about bioinformatics tools than we usually focus on here). The well-designed workshop was sponsored by Sense About Science, a UK group that has been working for years to get good science in the media and challenge bad science, and The Cambridge Science Festival.

But I think it’s important to mention this to genomics peeps because our field has a lot of responsibility and a lot of opportunity in the next few years. The “disappointment” that some media sources reflected on the human genome anniversary were frustrating. The potential that we have for great stuff in the next few years is huge. And we need to keep the public on our side to make sure they want to keep paying for the work we need to do.

But unless we participate in telling the real stories, it will be out of our hands. We also risk the wrong people getting media attention and telling crap and crankery stories and undermining the work. So I’ll be posting 2 pieces (broken out because they are long) about scientists who have guidance on working with the media, and from science journalists telling us what they need from us to make the stories great. If we can work together in a constructive way, we’ll be able to convey the excitement of discovery and the benefits of our work, properly.

Standing up for Science, part 1: Scientist tales

Standing up for Science, part 2: Journalist tales and tips for young scientists

2 thoughts on “Standing up for genomics in the media? Updated with Part 2

  1. Manuel Corpas

    Many thanks for bringing this issue of media engagement to the fore. I agree that currently the media is rather disengaged with a lot of the discoveries and advances that are happenning in the field of genomics.

    If personal genomics is rather neglected, I would say that crop genomics and animal welfare are even more. I would argue that the benefits that genomics can bring to these two budding fields are definitively being overlooked.

  2. Mary Post author

    Thanks, Manuel–that’s my feeling too! And your project is such a cool way of engaging people too. Are you getting some media from that? If not–can we pitch your stuff to some journos who might make some pitches of their own from that?

    Later today I’ll do the second part (with tips from journalists).

    For those who don’t know, Manuel is having several of his family members sequenced and analyzed. Check out his blog (and publications related to that) for more details:

Comments are closed.